Camp Cadet of Bedford County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251668730
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bedford, PA, USA
Phone
8143108667
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$53,667
Expenses
$42,259
Assets
$117,028

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TONYA OSMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TONYA OSMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • RICHARD KOONTZ (VICE PRESIDE)
  • KAYLA HETZEL (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Camp cadet of bedford county (camp cadet) was incorporated on april 12, 1991 under the laws of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania for the purpose of operating a summer camp for the children and teenagers of bedford county. It is designed specifically for the purpose of sponsoring, organizing and carrying out programs that provide educational, recreational and related experiences for the youth of bedford county, Pennsylvania.

What it reported doing in 2024

Youth camp - camp cadet of bedford county provides a week long camp for youth ages 12-15. The camp is designed to carry out programs that provide educational, recreational and related experiences for the youth of bedford county. In addition, the camp fosters personal and physical self- development, good moral character, self-discipline, civic and social responsbility and provides an understanding of relationships between youth and law enforcement agencies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.77; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $36K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.