Camp Albemarle Incorporated Co Tucker Griffin Barnes PC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521330200
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Charlottesville, VA, USA
Phone
4349510861
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,536
Expenses
$71,384
Assets
$793,525
Liabilities
$1,150

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Elisabeth Mazzeo (Vice President)
  • Bertha Durbin (Vice President)
  • Michael Durbin (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dory Doyle (Board Member)
  • Sam Leech (Board Member)
  • MaryAnn Lucia (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Camp creates opportunities for youth from a variety of backgrounds and cultures to be involved in learning and growth activities and projects. The camp has supported the 4-H principle of learn by doing and developing leadership among youth. They have recognized youth and community leaders for their positive accomplishments and contributions to their communities. Finally, the camp has encouraged and provided opportunities for intergenerational mentoring that allow youth and adults to learn from one another.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Camp creates opportunities for youth from a variety ofbackgrounds and cultures to be involved in learning andgrowth activities and projects. The camp has supportedthe 4-H principle of learn by doing and developingleadership among youth. They have recognized youth andcommunity leaders for their positive accomplishments andcontributions to their communities. Finally, the camp has encouraged and provided opportunities forintergenerational mentoring that allow youth and adults tolearn from one another.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.7%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 58.1%; rating input score 58
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.4%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.12; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 64.7% of revenue deployed · 58.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $41K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.