Tri Valley Health System

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
476028103
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cambridge, NE, US
Phone
1-308-697-3329
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$28,836,091
Expenses
$27,640,637
Assets
$28,085,284
Liabilities
$14,235,264

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LaVern Banzhaf (President)
  • James McGowen (Vice President)
  • Clay Jordan (CEO)
  • Jessica Fisher (Former CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Shiuvaun Jaeger MD (Family Practice/Obstetrics): $601,986 total reported compensation
  • Lennie Deaver MD (Family Practice/Obstetrics): $469,481 total reported compensation
  • Rachelle Kaspar-Cope MD (Family Practice/Obstetrics): $469,015 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the lives we touch by providing care of the highest quality throughout life's journey.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cambridge Memorial Hospital, Inc., dba Tri Valley Health System operates a 20-bed critical access hospital located in Cambridge, Nebraska. The hospital provides short-term inpatient and outpatient care. Tri Valley Health System operates a full-time emergency room and provides emergency care regardless of the ability to pay. The emergency room had 1,153 emergency center visits this year. Through its integrated network of providers, Tri Valley Health System provides emergency and non-emergency services to the communities it serves. Tri Valley Health System initiated a "walk-in" clinic through one of their Rural Health Clinics. Statement continued on Schedule O.Throughout the year, 3,784 patients were seen through the "walk-in" clinics.Services are accessible to the communities through participation in government programs like Medicare and Medicaid and by offering assistance through the Tri Valley Health System Charity Program. The Tri Valley Health System Charity Program provides discounted and free services to patients who lack the resources to be fully responsible for the health care they receive. The Charity Program is designed to ensure the communities served by Tri Valley Health System have access to needed healthcare services. The Tri Valley Health System Board of Trustees oversees services delivered under the Charity Care Policy including assessing community needs, approving eligibility criteria and monitoring the effectiveness of the program in providing community access to medical care. Records are maintained to identify and monitor the level of charity care provided. The estimated cost of providing these services was $52,000 for the year ended April 30, 2025 calculated by multiplying the ratio of cost to gross charges for the Health System by the gross uncompensated charges associated with providing charity to its patients.In addition, the Health System provides services to other patients under certain government-reimbursed public aid programs. Such programs pay providers amounts which are less than established charges for the services provided to the recipients, and for some services the payments are less than the cost of rendering the services provided.The Health System also commits significant time and resources to endeavors and critical services which meet otherwise unfulfilled community needs. Many of these activities are sponsored with the knowledge that they will not be self-supporting or financially viable.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $23.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $602K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.1M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.