Cambria Parkview Apartments

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237327217
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Cambria, WI, USA
Phone
9203485485
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,604
Expenses
$77,250
Assets
$414,379
Liabilities
$89,441

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES E SANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DONNA WHITE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES E SANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DONNA WHITE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PAM PLAUTZ (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A federally assisted and regulated (usda rural development) affordable housing complex providing low cost rental units to low income elderly tenants in rural Wisconsin.

What it reported doing in 2016

The organization provides affordable rental housing to low income elderly tenants in cambria, Wisconsin. Tenant rent payments are calculated as a percentage of their total income and are subject to federal guidelines. The apartment complex contains 20 units.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.36; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -76.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.