Camas Music Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923920191
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Camas, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5037016456
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Performing Arts Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,188
- Expenses
- $39,269
- Assets
- $45,692
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AMY DANIELS (PRESIDENT)
- CAT ZALANKA (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ETHAN CHESSIN (MUSIC TEACHER LIAISON)
- BRI LEE (GALA CO-CHAIR)
- LINDSAY SILER (FOOTBALL GAME CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Camas Music Boosters is organized to support and enhance music education within the Camas School District. The organization works in partnership with educators, administrators, and the community to provide financial resources, volunteer support, and advocacy for K12 music programs. Its primary purpose is to ensure that all students have access to high-quality music education and performance opportunities by funding instruments, equipment, instructional resources, and enrichment programs, as well as promoting community engagement in the performing arts.
What it reported doing in 2024
Grant Funding to Support K12 Music ProgramsThe organization provided financial support to music programs across the Camas School District through grants funded by community donations and fundraising efforts. During the year, funds were distributed to elementary, middle, and high school programs to purchase instruments, equipment, software, and performance-related resources, including percussion instruments, choir equipment, music classroom supplies, and cultural music program materials. These grants directly enhanced student access to music education and supported program sustainability across all grade levels.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 67% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.