Called To Serve CDC Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464404323
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2156051137
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Economic Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,706,262
Expenses
$1,244,997
Assets
$12,050,700
Liabilities
$7,736,118

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • Amelia Price: $75,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community and economic development.

What it reported doing in 2025

CTS mission is to serve as an anchor for community renewal and to support endeavors that break intergenerational poverty, primarily in the Tioga neighborhood. We fulfill this mission by developing innovative solutions that strengthen and sustain Tioga in all its community manifestations. Through partnership, energy and a collective vision, Called to Serve CDC is prepared to work and engage with all groups and individuals who share our mission and common vision for Tioga and the Philadelphia region.LIST OF ACTIVITIES[A] "Read By 4th" is a Philadelphia citywide effort aimed at boosting the number of students entering 4th reading at grade level. In addition, Goal 1 of the School District of Philadelphia is the percentage of students in grades 3-8 who are proficient on the state ELA assessment will grow from 34.0% in August 2023 to 65.0% by August 2030. In support of these efforts, CTS has partnered with the Philadelphia Literacy Initiative, a high-intensity reading intervention and enrichment support for kindergarten through grade three scholars. CTS is a sponsor of the program at Kenderton. [B] The CTS BriDDge (Bridging the Digital Divide) program leverages Esports to develop social-emotional learning skills among school-age children. The program seeks to help youth build goal-setting, foster intentional self-regulation, and foster strong relationships between peers, coaches, and students. The program operates as an after-school program and summer camp. [C] CTS sponsors a quarterly awards luncheon celebrating academic achievement for students at Bethune Elementary [D] Through a contract with the City of Philadelphia's Philadelphia Taking Care of Business (PHL TCB) program, CTS's Workforce Development Program takes a double bottom-line approach to economic development in underserved communities. The program provides career pathways for returning citizens while spurring neighborhood commercial revitalization and economic growth by keeping the commercial corridor as one of the pillars for encouraging growth and development on the Broad, Germantown, and Erie commercial corridors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.4%; rating input score 66
  • Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $30.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.68; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.4% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.