California World History Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
753244932
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Assets
$2,693

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • Sharlene Sayegh (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a group of high school and college/university teachers committed to promoting the teaching of world, or global, history in our state of California. We do that by holding an annual conference where middle, high school and college/university teachers can present their research and ideas ans where everyone can learn about recent developments in the study of world history. The conferences encourage teachers to exchange information, curriculum plans, and course syllabi, and to launch additional courses in world history.

What it reported doing in 2020

We are a group of high school and college/university teachers committed to promoting the teaching of world, or global, history in our state of California. We do that by holding an annual conference where middle, high school and college/university teachers can present their research and ideas and where everyone can learn about recent developments in the study of world history. The conferences encourage teachers to exchange information, curriculum plans, and course syllabi, and to launch additional courses in world history. The annual conference was held in February 2017.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.