California Veterans Legal Task Force

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452594060
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
La Mesa, CA, USA
Phone
6192343707
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$242,420
Expenses
$182,129
Assets
$63,982
Liabilities
$75

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BARRY WILSON (President)
  • JENNIFER LOUIS (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • BARRY WILSON (President)
  • CINDY EDMONSON (Secretary)
  • HEIDI YEPIS (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organize and coordinate free legal services for California veterans.

What it reported doing in 2020

CVLTF 2020 Key AccomplishmentsKey StatisticsVeterans Legal Assistance Referral Clinics (VLARC) Statistics for 2020 (Jan-Dec)23 Veteran Clients Served 68 Total # of Legal Matters Criminal Defense Attorney Consultations for 2020 (Jan-Dec)191 Case Consultations with Appointed Defense Counsel239.9 hours dedicated legal workExpanding Californias Veterans Treatment Courts (VTCs)Veterans Legal Assistance and Referral Clinics (VLARC) (San Diego County) San Diego based Veterans Legal Assistance and referral Clinic (VLARC) providing omnibus legal assistance to veterans in San Diego County. Conducted legal assessments, recruited pro bono counsel, completed applications for various benefits to assist veterans removing barriers to housing, employment and benefits. In December 2018, we hosted five law students from USC and California Western law schools who conducted new research to build our brief bank and support our pro bono counsel. VLARC clinics are partners in the Military & Veterans Resource Centers (MVRC) which are part of the San Diego County Live Well Centers in Escondido and National City. MVRC Team includes 23 merit-selected nonprofit organizations providing Veteran services. Our partners in MVRC include Mental Health Services, Inc., Veterans Village of San Diego, Goodwill Industries, San Diego Financial Literacy Foundation, and Interfaith Community Services. With the County Office of Military and Veterans Services, MVRC provides VA/public benefits, housing, jobs, mental health and financial services. CVLTF is the only partner handling Veterans' legal issues. CVLTF Technical Assistance and Recognition CVLTF continues to provide community and statewide technical assistance to public officials and lawmakers on legal issues of concern to military, veterans, and their families. CVLTF consultants provided data, educational information, and testimony to California State Assembly and Senate members and hearings for Federal Congressional Representatives.Upgraded CVLTF.org WebsiteContinue to add to www.CVLTF.org website with research, video and educational information to veterans and their advocates at the intersection of mental health/trauma and the justice system. Increased by 150% the nationwide use of CVLTF VTC Mentor training video program and research to assist criminal justice professionals in understanding the connection between military related mental health conditions and criminal behavior/treatment. This website continues to be cited in legislature publications and opinions by local and state judges and the State Assembly Appropriations Committee as a trusted resource on justice involved veterans.Continued VTC Team and Mentor TrainingProvided training for VTC teams in the (federal) United States Southern District of California, which stood up as the fourth federal Veterans Treatment Court in the U.S.Provided in partnership with Justice4Vets mentor training to Veterans Treatment Court teams in Cook County IL Honolulu, HI and Charleston, NC.Published data reports for San Diego Military Diversion program and CA Veterans Treatment Court Survey and added numerous clinical studies on our websiteCommunity Education and CollaborationPresented training on Military Discharge Upgrades to veteran service representatives from tribes throughout California to equip them in assisting Indian veterans to access their benefits and correct their service recordsEngaged VISTA staff member to develop peer specialist program to enable follow up with our VLARC clients who received community referrals to improve follow up actions by these veteran clientsProvided training regarding legal topics to County and nonprofit staff members of the Military & Veterans Resource Centers and two Criminal Defense Bar associations of San Diego County Recognized by San Diego County Board of Supervisors as an official partner of the County of San Diego Live Well ProgramCo-sponsored Veterans Forum event with the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors to celebrate Veter

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.9%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $134K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.