California Theater Consortium Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881317394
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Berkeley, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5104994199
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,000
- Expenses
- $24,725
- Assets
- $20,450
- Liabilities
- $232,714
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Glen Epperson (Co-Founder, Secretary, Program Manager)
- Jennifer Boesing (Co-Founder, Program Ambasador)
- Laurie Capitelli (Community Abasador)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission: Creating a high-quality, affordable performance venue for nonprofit organizations. Main Program: In 2024, the organization continued its architectural design program tailored for nonprofits. Services included community-focused venue planning, accessibility integration, and sustainable building design-ensuring artistic spaces that reflect equity and fiscal responsibility.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization has achieved significant milestones in its largest program service, Architectural Design Services. These accomplishments include: 1. **Innovative Designs**: Creating cutting-edge architectural designs tailored to the unique needs and specifications of nonprofit clients. These designs integrate functionality, aesthetics, and sustainability principles to optimize the performance venue's impact. 2. **Cost-Effective Solutions**: Implementing cost-effective design strategies without compromising quality or functionality. By leveraging innovative materials and construction techniques, the organization ensures that nonprofits can achieve their vision within budget constraints. 3. **Collaborative Approach**: Fostering a collaborative design process that actively involves nonprofit clients in decision-making. This approach ensures that the final architectural design aligns closely with the organization's mission, values, and operational requirements. 4. **Accessibility and Inclusivity**: Prioritizing accessibility and inclusivity in architectural designs to accommodate diverse audiences and performers. This commitment ensures that the performance venue is welcoming and accessible to individuals of all abilities and backgrounds. 5. **Community Impact**: Leveraging architectural design as a catalyst for positive social change and community development. The organization's designs not only enhance the cultural landscape but also contribute to the revitalization of underserved neighborhoods and communities. Overall, the Architectural Design Services program has played a pivotal role in empowering nonprofit organizations to realize their vision for high-quality performance venues that are both functional and financially sustainable.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,136.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.83; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 11.38; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -195.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -132.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.