California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941085570
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5592782586
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,072,774
Expenses
$683,717
Assets
$11,687,752
Liabilities
$421,987

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sharacey Warsinger (Vice President)
  • Diana Gomez (President Elect)
  • John Gomes (Vice President)
  • Elisha Henderson (President)
  • Scott Miller (Past President)
  • Blake Zante (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jacquelyn K Glasener (ED/Secretary): $220,029 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire, engage, and celebrate alumni to support student success.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Fresno State Alumni Association fulfills its exempt purpose through our mission of inspiring, engaging and celebrating alumni to support student success. We build an opportunity for connection, keeping students connected to alumni and our alumni and community of friends connected to Fresno State. The Alumni Association, along with our 16 chapters and clubs, host many in-person events throughout the year. More details about our events may be found below.Tailgates: The Alumni Association hosts the Homecoming Tailgate on campus each year. In addition, tailgate parties are held once or twice a year prior to an away football game to encourage alumni and families from out of the area to remain connected to Fresno State.Top Dog Alumni Awards: The Top Dog Alumni Awards is an FSAA signature event, whereby outstanding alumni are honored from the eight schools and colleges along with four awards from divisions on campus. In addition, an award is given to someone who has given outstanding service to Fresno State and the alumni Associate, plus an overall recipient as the distinguished Alumnus/Alumna. This event is both an in-person and televised and live streamed event showcasing to the community our commitment to excellence.Grad Fest: All students who are eligible to graduate are invited to Grad Fest. They are encouraged to support the FSAA and get a grad box which includes their cap and gown, alumni merchandise, and off-campus benefits. Hopefully this will keep them in touch with the FSAA after graduation, therefore keeping them informed of campus activities.Chapter and Club Events: These alumni-led volunteer groups support student needs and help alumni stay connected to their alma mater through events, networking and by raising funds to support student scholarships and campus programs. Events include, but are not limited to golf tournaments, wine tasting, tailgates, conferences and award functions.Live Mascot Program: Fresno State's live mascot, Victor E. Bulldog III, is owned by the Alumni Association. He brings the spirit of the university to more than 300 appearances each year. Victor's appearances take place on campus, within the Fresno community and across the state of California. These events allow the University to engage with alumni, students, friends of the university and future Bulldogs.Alumni and Community e-Newsletter: This e-communication is sent throughout the year to alumni and friends to recognize and tell the stories of our alumni and students and to let people know what is happening on campus with our chapters and clubs as well as with our programs and events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 47% for direct work, and 53% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.3%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $135.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.3%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.09; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.3% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $511K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $220K · 21 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $100K reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 27 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.