California Society of Radiologic Technologists

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
952474449
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Fresno, CA, USA
Phone
5592286140
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$140,593
Expenses
$94,312
Assets
$125,834
Liabilities
$52,365

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • William Edmunds (President)
  • Kristin Beinschroth (President)
  • Cheryl Young (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • William Edmunds (President)
  • Doris Abrishami (Chairman)
  • Kristin Beinschroth (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to provide leadership for the radiologic science professions and to promote excellent patient care through quality education and legislation.

What it reported doing in 2024

Looking to enter the profession. Through the organization's annual conference and other one day seminars, the organization offers an opportunity to learn the latest techniques and practices that are necessary to excel as a professional in the field of medical imaging. The organization also offers workshops designed to provide specialized certification in venipuncture, which is a certification that is required in order for one to carry out this medical procedure. The organization also offers scholarship opportunities for radiology students and advocates for legislative and regulatory issues important to the profession.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.