California Society of Anesthesiologists Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
946076499
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9162905830
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,720,560
Expenses
$2,545,990
Assets
$3,312,550
Liabilities
$674,926

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

29 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTONIO HERNANDEZ CONTE MD MBA FAS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • PHILIP LEVIN MD FASA (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTINA M MENOR MD MS FASA (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • EDWARD R MARIANO MD MAS (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES MOORE (PRESIDENT EMERITUS)
  • DAVID BUTLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANTONIO HERNANDEZ CONTE MD MBA FAS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT): $37,750 total reported compensation
  • PHILIP LEVIN MD FASA (PRESIDENT): $36,250 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTINA M MENOR MD MS FASA (PRESIDENT-ELECT): $6,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Cultivate excellence through innovation, education, and leadership. Support, promote, and protect the highest standards in anesthesia care. Advocate for patients and anesthesiologists

What it reported doing in 2024

The mission of the educational programs division of the California society of anesthesiologists is to provide relevant, timely, high quality education to anesthesia professionals from California and all over the world. This, in turn, allows the learners to deliver high quality patient care. We deliver this education using a variety of platforms, including didactic lectures, journal articles, internet courses and hands-on workshops.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 57.4%; rating input score 57; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 89.3%; rating input score 89; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 25 of 28 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $38K · 29 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.1M reported
  • Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 57/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.