Sutter Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942728423
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9162866665
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$75,700,230
Expenses
$37,191,075
Assets
$539,315,811
Liabilities
$19,952,838

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

37 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Hamila Kownacki (CEO, CPMC)
  • Allison Duignan (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Hamila Kownacki (CEO, CPMC): $1,783,871 total reported compensation
  • Henry Yu (CFO, San Francisco Division): $1,108,351 total reported compensation
  • Raya Elias-Petros (Chief Philanthropy Officer-SH): $1,058,747 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We enhance the well-being of people in the communities we serve through a not-for-profit commitment to compassion and excellence in healthcare services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Program service accomplishments the funds we raise in support of sutter bay hospitals (sbh) and sutter bay medical foundation (sbmf) have a real impact on the care our patients receive. While hospital revenues typically cover day-to-day operating expenses, charitable gifts allow us to make crucial improvements not covered by the medical center's annual budget. That includes purchasing new equipment, expanding key programs and upgrading our facilities. By contributing to our priorities, donors funded programs and equipment purchases that our physicians designated as critically necessary in 2024. They helped provide primary health care services for women and children in our poorest neighborhoods; offered a comforting respite for alzheimer's patients and those nearing the end of life; purchased vital technology making treatment easier for patients with cancer, cardiac conditions, and neurological disorders. Donors helped support these annual priorities: cancer programs $4,100,000 cardiology programs $900,000 neuroscience programs $1,400,000 pediatric care programs $2,100,000 womens' health $1,000,000 community health programs (some are included in annual priorities): . Coming home hospice $1,100,000 . Community health resource center $80,000 . Forbes norris als center $160,000 . Institute for health and healing (ihh) $220,000 . Kalmanovitz child development center $960,000 of course, our needs go far beyond these annual priorities, and our compassionate contributors have many other options when it comes to sharing their charitable spirit. Often times our supporters or their family members have been patients here, so they know firsthand the impact their gifts can make, especially in programs like these - all of which received significant donor support last year. Children's health child life program neonatal intensive care unit child development financial needs scholarships neuroscience ray dolby brain health center neuroscience general support advanced care cancer avatar project ungerleider palliative care center for melanoma treatment & research center for diabetes services emergency medicine transplant programs women's health notkin family breast cancer recovery program breast health digital mammography community and integrated health program in medicine & human values research and education breast cancer research clinical trials cpmc research institute department of medicine teaching fund nursing education

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 88% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.9%; rating input score 94; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.5; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 70.8% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 31 of 33 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.8M · 37 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $784K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 57 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.