California Oncology Research Institute Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
421757010
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Santa Monica, CA, USA
Phone
3108830096
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Cancer Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$280,342
Expenses
$345,019
Assets
$3,440,161
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jonathan Jacobs (President)
  • Joyce Eisenberg-Keefer (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ANTON BILCHIK MD (Secretary)
  • Jonathan Jacobs (President)
  • Nicholas Thacker (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission - The California Oncology Research Institute is committed to curing cancer through educating communities, ensuring access to early detection screenings and fostering innovative research and treatments. We care about establishing relationships within Los Angeles' underserved neighborhoods to provide information about several types of cancers.

What it reported doing in 2024

Three Main Goals: a) Cancer Researchb) Outreach and Education c) Artificial Intelligence (AI)and d) Legacy planningExpansion of Clinical Research: The CORI doctors have the expertise, track record, and enthusiasm to continue the excellence in clinical research through federal- and industry-funded clinical trials. However, an expanded infrastructure is necessary to maintain this effort and allow for CORI to meet its outstanding potential. The expansion requires additional personnel to facilitate industry trial identification, development and negotiation of trial budgets and contracts, assistance in establishing and documenting protocols. Investment in the clinical infrastructure in the near future would allow expansion of the program. Trainees and Researchers: CORI has supported the research of leading clinicians, young researchers and educators leading to national presentations and publications in peer-review journals. All publications have and will continue to acknowledge CORI as a source of funding.Expanding Community Outreach Activities and Educational Programs: CORI intends to offer at least three cancer educational workshops and cancer screening programs to underserved communities including inner city churches throughout the greater Los Angeles area, expand the cancer screening program to include prostate and colorectal screenings, build new partnerships with other cancer awareness and/or similar cancer organizations and increase our cancer educational literature that is offered at each cancer workshop.Strategic Alliances: Given the significant financial constraints of government funded research in the areas of clinical trials, genomic sequencing and other areas of clinical and translational research, as well as to sustain the support of trainees, strong strategic partners are needed. There may be opportunities to expand existing alliances by strengthening relationships with strategic collaborators and philanthropic organizations. These include major universities in the US and Israel as well as respected foundations such as Stand up to Cancer, the American Cancer Society, Providence Health System and Cancer Support Community.Artificial Intelligence (AI) personalize cancer care (see details below)Legacy Planning: Establish legacy planning as part of its philanthropyTranslational Lab Research: Colorectal Progress Report Perform translational multi-omics on colorectal cancer (CRC) research in early onset (EOCRC) versus late onset (LOCRC) patients to better understand the cause of EOCRC and identify potential targets for treatment.Epidemiology of Early-onset colorectal cancer(EOCRC)The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as diagnosis before the age of 50, is on the rise globally, in contrast to the decreasing trend in late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC). Since the 1990s, the incidence of EOCRC has increased by2% annually, particularly in Western countries such as North America and Western Europe. While the exact causes remain unknown, environmental demographic factors such as dietary changes, obesity, lack of physical activity, and antibiotic use are thought to play a role. EOCRC patients are also often diagnosed at advanced clinical stages (III or IV) because they are not typically targeted for routine screening, and their symptoms can be mistaken for other colon related benign conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome. The prognosis for EOCRC is poorer than for LOCRC at the same stage, due to the more aggressive biological nature of these tumors. The purpose of this study is to elucidate potential molecular pathogenic mechanisms of EOCRC which may lead to earlier diagnosis and potential targets for therapy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.97; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $321K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.