California Mountain Biking Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843396574
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2019
Location
South Lake Tahoe, CA, USA
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$230,462
Expenses
$275,689
Assets
$44,127
Liabilities
$73,109

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Steve Messer (President)
  • Rob Peterson (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Steve Messer (President)
  • Susie Murphy (Secretary)
  • Rob Peterson (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The California Mountain Biking Coalitions mission is to Improve and increase trail access for mountain biking throughout California by providing a unified statewide voice for organizations and individuals

What it reported doing in 2024

CAMTB is 501(c)(4) coalition representing and supporting 30+ CA trail advocacy organizations, which combined represent 250,000+ mountain bikers across the state. CAMTB is organized: (i) to provide a unified statewide voice for organizations and individuals with common interests in improving and increasing trail access and other off-road opportunities for cyclists throughout California; (ii) to advocate for improved opportunities to steward, care for, create, and experience California's open spaces; (iii) to provide leadership in protection and preservation of the environment by advocating for the development of informed public policy and by encouraging the establishment and management of protected land that will increase and improve off-road cycling opportunities and experiences within the State of California; (iv) to serve as a platform for California organizations and advocates to organize and coordinate their efforts to protect and steward public lands and the trails accessing them, and to ensure these lands and trails can be enjoyed in a meaningful and sustainable manner by the diverse people of California and (v) and to carry on other activities associated with the foregoing purposes as allowed by law.Our primary activities in 2023, and the associated revenue and expense, centered on engaging key land managers, tracking legislation, engaging State and Federal legislators, and recruiting, and retaining coalition members. Coalition Members pay a participatory fee each year, which in 2023, amounted to a gross revenue of $33,934. The major categorical expenses associated with this revenue in 2023 included: Marketing & Advertising of $17,578, which was used to build awareness, conduct outreach to potential coalition members, and raise funds.Contractors Fees: $143,881, which was used to engage subject matter experts and support our outreach programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.1%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.41 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.66; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.1% of revenue deployed · 81.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $224K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.