California Latinas for Reproductive Justice
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262213868
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2132705258
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,629,625
- Expenses
- $1,890,603
- Assets
- $3,221,761
- Liabilities
- $177,479
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA JIMENEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA JIMENEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $147,827 total reported compensation
- EMELINA M SANDOVAL DE CHACON (FINANCE AND OPERATIONS DIR): $114,839 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
California latinas for reproductive justice (clrj) is a statewide organization committed to honoring the experiences of latinas to uphold our dignity, our bodies, sexuality, and families. We build latinas' power and cultivate leadership through community education, policy advocacy, and community-informed research to achieve reproductive justice.
What it reported doing in 2024
Clrj has three main programmatic areas, community organizing and engagement, policy, and research. Our operations in these areas are designed as strategies to achieve annual objectives and long-term goals.community organizing and engagement (coe): clrj's community organizing and engagement department aims to build latina/e leadership and ensure that policy priorities are informed, shaped and moved by our communities. This program included activities through the community organizing pilot, unin de vecinas (udv) and the justice for young families initiative (j4yf). Udv focused its work on tenants' rights and an ongoing housing justice campaign, while j4yf is an initiative of California latinas for reproductive justice that champions young people's rights to self-determination and bodily autonomy, including decisions about whether or not to become parents, and their right to parent the children they have within a supportive environment. Accomplishments:- community organizing and engagement department continued to defend housing protections as an ongoing commitment to housing is reproductive justice. Clrj mobilized with the housing base, union de vecinas, and other key allies to safeguard the rent stabilization ordinance (rso) in bell gardens, ca. Through extensive outreach, a social media toolkit, and base building, we secured 30 public comments in support of the ordinance to ensure the city council upheld the ordinance despite heavy pressure from opposition to revoke it. Clrj deepened community knowledge through civic engagement workshops, partnered with legal experts (lafla), and supported t.u.r.n's utility campaign to fight unjust electricity hikes. Clrj was honored at t.u.r.n's 50th anniversary to receive the affordable housing grassroots champion award.- clrj's community organizing team continued coalition building through the involvement in the southeast la youth organizing network (syon). As a coalition member for the s.y.o.n network, clrj developed and disseminated surveys in the community of southeast los angeles, totaling over 150 completed surveys. Clrj hosted a youth visioning workshop with their housing base to hear the direct needs of youth in sela.- the community organizing team launched its first reproductive justice base in southeast los angeles in march. Clrj built a diverse, multigenerational network to advance knowledge of reproductive justice through eight meetings and mobilized the members to support survey dissemination for the abortion safe haven project. Lastly, the team sent three community leaders to the national conference hosted by sistersong women of color reproductive justice collective in Washington dc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 72%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $22.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84% of revenue deployed · 72% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $148K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.