California Infrastructure Delivery Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883375964
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Long Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5623661030
- Rating
- 42
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $122,308
- Expenses
- $118,738
- Assets
- $148,148
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- PETER TATEISHI (DIRECTOR)
- DAMIAN BECERRA (DIRECTOR)
- BRANDON TESSIER (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
California infrastructure delivery coalition (calinfra) was created for the purpose of improving awareness and enabling increased utilization of the various forms of alternative project delivery among the members of the corporation and throughout the infrastructure delivery industry in general. Within the confines of this exempt purpose, the directors and officers select the particular activities that calinfra conducts and/or supports. Calinfra also expects to engage an executive director to coordinate and oversee the activities.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the year ended june 30, 2025, calinfra advanced its mission to improve California's infrastructure delivery by expanding awareness, education, and advocacy around alternative project delivery (apd) methods. Our programs benefited public agencies, private partners, labor groups, and the broader community of infrastructure practitioners.through our education program, calinfra hosted workshops, roundtables, and our annual conference, engaging participants including state and local agency officials, engineers, and contractors. These sessions provided training on best practices in progressive design-build, cm/gc, and public-private partnerships, equipping decision-makers to evaluate and implement delivery methods that reduce cost and risk while accelerating project timelines.through our state of practice program, calinfra tracked California's growing alternative delivery project pipeline and distributed research and analysis to members and stakeholders on delivery method performance and lessons learned. Our ongoing monitoring activities reinforced calinfra's role as a trusted resource for applied knowledge on alternative project delivery in California.through our outreach program, calinfra engaged the California legislature, the California transportation commission, caltrans, the department of water resources, and local agencies to support legislation enabling broader use of apd methods. Member organizations participated in these outreach efforts, strengthening the coalition's role as the unifying voice for infrastructure delivery reform in California.collectively, these accomplishments demonstrate calinfra's continued progress in building capacity, fostering collaboration, and advancing policies that enable California's public sector to deliver critical infrastructure more efficiently and effectively.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 11
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10.8%; rating input score 11
- Program expense ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 11
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -94.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10.8% of revenue deployed · 11.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.