California Indians Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
956053781
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Phone
5204371583
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$177,170
Expenses
$182,472
Assets
$270,105

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

30 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Harris (President)
  • Eugene Bugatto (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • John Harris (President)
  • Eugene Bugatto (Vice President)
  • Douglas B Jensen (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Social and Sporting Club

What it reported doing in 2024

Four events for our membership were held during the year. They were:-- 2024 Annual Board Meeting held in Fairfield, CA on September 27, 2024. Total attendees were 31persons.-- 2024 Sporting Clays event held in Birds Landing, CA on September 28, 2024. Total attendees were 80 persons. The event consisted of a Sporting Clays shooting competition and BBQ and social hour.-- 2025 Potlatch event held in Rosemead, CA on March 13-16, 2025. Total attendees ranged from 55 to 73 persons depending on the day. The Potlatch included three different social activities and dinners, in addition to the shooting competition, The shooting competition consisted of seven unique events in Sporting Clays, Trap and Skeet.-- 2025 Pow Wow event held in Stockton, CA on June 9-14, 2025. Total attendees ranged from 46 to 73 persons depending on the day. The Pow Wow included five different social activities and hosted dinners, in addition to the shooting competition. The shooting competition consisted of ten unique events in Trap and Sheet.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.1%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.48; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.1% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 30 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.