California Equestrian Park
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274219878
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Santa Rosa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7075416091
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,114
- Expenses
- $30,507
- Assets
- $666
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To purchase and develop real property in sonoma county, California, to build and operate a facility which will include equestrian show and riding facilities (arenas, trails, barns, cross country courses, polo field, and exercise track), a performance center, a museum/library, a conference/educational center, equine veterinary center and campgrounds.
What it reported doing in 2012
Funding secured for the Wetlands Study. Identified & interviewed consultants to conducted Wetlands Study and Completion of. Recruited a new Board member.Made the Front page article on CEPEC in the Petaluma Newspaper (Argus). Made Presentations to Congressman, Mike Thompson, several service organizations (Rotary club Sebastopol, Redwood Trail blazers, Sonoma County Stable Owners & Trainers, Sonoma County Tourist Bureau,), and 40 exhibitions at Farmers Market). Made a Proposal to acquire the main CEPEC site and Initiated joint projects with Sonoma State University (fund Raiser & Equine Studies research). Obtained contributions (sponsorship & donations) and hosted fund raising event, Gala.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -38%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $11K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.