California Congress of Parents Teachers & Students Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
946171747
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Belmont, CA, USA
Phone
6505950210
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,889
Expenses
$63,173
Assets
$162,457
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAORI KOBAYASHI (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KAORI KOBAYASHI (PRESIDENT)
  • PENNY FOKS (EXECUTIVE VP)
  • ELIZABETH HARVEY-GUEDES (VP OF COMMUN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Carlmont parent teacher student assocaition (ptsa) mission is to advocate for students and families, and to bring closer relationship between home and school so that parents and teachers may work collaboratively in educating their children and youth.

What it reported doing in 2025

Ptsa also provides support and services to various school activities and events - such as chaperone students for school events; manage student store; volunteers coordination; host events such as teachers/staff appreciation and ptsa awards evening; raise funds through grad day concessions, sale of pe clothes and spirit wear.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 12
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.7%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.57; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.1% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.