California Commissioning Collaborative Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 200546558
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5032484636
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Energy Resources Conservation and Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $38,590
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAUREN HUYNH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER SCOTT (CHAIRPERSON)
- GLENDA TOWNS (SECRETARY & TREASURER)
- MONIKA JESIONEK (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Environmental protection and education
What it reported doing in 2017
Conducted research on energy efficiency approaches and best practices. Outcomes, tools, and guidelines produced through this work are publicly available and free of charge.provided consulting services and report development on recommendations for code requirements related to early design decision-making processes that will impact energy efficiency and optimized building operations and encourage commissioning best practices in non-residential buildings.1. Maintained a website of free resources for building commissioning professionals.2. Conducted webinars and in-person meetings to promote commissioning best pract
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -47.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -36.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.