California Coalition for Truth in Olive Oil Labeling
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853854950
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Clovis, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5592253000
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Business and Industry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,100
- Expenses
- $1,466
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- ALAN HILBURG (Chairman)
- BRADY WHITLOW (Treasurer)
- PAUL RIORDAN (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this corporation is to improve conditions in the California olive oil industry by, including but not limited to, protecting consumers, retailers, farm families and California olive oil producers from deceptive advertising and labeling practices that undermine the integrity of the California-grown olive oil industry and protect the value of 100% California grown olives.
What it reported doing in 2023
The coalition helped successfully pass assembly bill 535 which mandates that if "California" is used on the label of a product containing non-California grown oil, the percentage of California oil must be listed in the same font size as the word "California". The passage of ab 535 is a step in the right direction to end the exploitation of the "California" name and positive reputation which ultimately undermines actual California olive oil producers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -33.3%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -145.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -99.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.