California Careforce
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 452408171
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Roseville, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9167494170
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $695,621
- Expenses
- $655,253
- Assets
- $553,497
- Liabilities
- $38,457
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Terre Donaldson (President)
- Craig Bloom (Past President)
- Cathy DiFrancesco (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Cyndi Ankiewicz (Executive Dir.): $100,217 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
California CareForce (CCF) brings together volunteer healthcare professionals, community leaders, and engaged citizens to sponsor temporary clinics across California where free dental, vision and medical care is provided to those in need. CCF believes everyone has the inalienable right of access to healthcare. CCF annually serves thousands of patients who lack the resources for much-needed healthcare services including 1) dental treatments; 2) vision screenings and eyeglasses; and 3) basic medical screenings.
What it reported doing in 2024
California CareForce volunteers provided veterans and their family members withFREE dental, medical, and vision services with a total value of $206,204. Theseservices were provided by 204 volunteers who dedicated 1,200 hours of their time atthe Placer Veterans Stand Down on May 7-8, 2024. Our volunteers provided 565people with dental, vision, and/or medical care at no-cost to our honored veteransincluding 85 extractions, 50 cleanings, 179 x-rays, 40 dentures, 43 medical exams,304 medical screenings, and 175 prescription glasses made.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.9%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.9% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $523K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.