California Association for Microenterprise Opportunity

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943246306
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
5107360797
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,177,837
Expenses
$5,946,542
Assets
$7,914,028
Liabilities
$3,863,555

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CAROLINA MARTINEZ (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CAROLINA MARTINEZ (CEO): $309,935 total reported compensation
  • MARK HERBERT (COO): $229,210 total reported compensation
  • HEIDI PICKMAN (VP ENGAGEMENT EXTERNAL RELATIONS): $163,318 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To grow a thriving ecosystem of support for underserved entrepreneurs where all entrepreneurs have access to the resources they need to succeed, creating family economic mobility and community prosperity.

What it reported doing in 2024

California association for microenterprise opportunity ("cameo") is an association of organizations, agencies, and individuals dedicated to furthering micro enterprise development in California and nationally. Cameo was formed in California in 1993 as a public benefit corporation. Cameo's mission is to increase opportunities for low-income people and communities by building capacity for micro enterprise organizations. Cameo builds capacity of practitioner organizations to better meet customer needs and improve the working environment for micro enterprise by educating the public and advocating on behalf of micro enterprise development.cameo expands resources and builds capacity for its member organizations who are providing entrepreneurs with small business training, business financing and technical assistance - coaching, capital assistance and networking. Cameo advocates for public policies that support the business sector and builds public awareness of its economic impacts through the following program categories: capacity building cameo builds industry capacity so that underserved entrepreneurs have access to the tools and support they need to thrive. This includes safe, flexible small business capital; culturally competent small business development services, resources, and referrals; and a professional industry and ecosystem that can respond to community context and local needs.community building cameo focuses on building community so that entrepreneurs can more easily navigate their local small business ecosystems to find the support and solutions they need. Cameo aims to ensure that local services are trusted, community-focused, high-quality, and aligned with industry standards. Cameo's goal is for entrepreneurs to feel supported by a collaborative service network that is genuinely invested in their long-term success.build power cameo builds power to ensure entrepreneurs are represented and supported in meaningful ways. This includes amplifying their voices in policy debates that affect their ability to start and grow businesses, fostering a collaborative service network that advocates for equitable and accessible small business ownership, and ensuring that policymakers recognize the vital role entrepreneurs play in the economy and prioritize their needs accordingly.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 81.3%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $24.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 59.2%; rating input score 59; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.7%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 81.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $310K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.