Calif Workers' Compensation Institute
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941591595
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5102519470
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,840,332
- Expenses
- $4,865,541
- Assets
- $12,856,573
- Liabilities
- $6,393,440
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
42 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEX SWEDLOW (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ALEX SWEDLOW (PRESIDENT): $640,291 total reported compensation
- RENA DAVID (SVP RESEARCH & OPS/CFO/CORP TREASURER): $400,969 total reported compensation
- SARA WIDENER-BRIGHTWELL (SVP CLAIMS/GENERAL COUNSEL/CORP SECRETARY): $304,896 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o.
What it reported doing in 2024
The California workers' compensation institute (cwci) has 23 member insurers (approximately 76% of ca workers' compensation market) and 29 associate members (self-insureds). Cwci's primary function is to generate reliable, objective data that can be used to identify and monitor systemwide trends, and to analyze key issues of interest to the workers' compensation community and public policymakers. Towards that end, in 2024, cwci's major accomplishments included: 1) produced and distributed over 300 plus publications including bulletins, research reports, executive memos, executive briefings, significant decision, regulatory comments, and regulatory tracker, which are all available to cwci member company employees by logging on to the website - www.cwci.org with their username and password; 2) conducted educational program on the annual workers' compensation case law: 2024 update; 3) filed amicus brief; 4) presented (virtual) cwci research at numerous member-relations meetings, public hearings, industry meetings and forums; and 5) processed and shipped 256 orders of pamphlets, posting notices, claim forms, research studies, and seminar manuals. In addition, cwci enhanced its unique six interactive data applications five only available to its members, and one app to the public. The public application allows users to examine data on covid-19 and non-covid-19 claims in the California workers' compensation system. The member applications use data from cwci's industry research information system (iris) to provide information on claim payment trends, regional variation, and medical utilization. Cwci continues to assist its members in assessing their operations compared to the industry as a whole. The organization has a board of directors, executive committee, audit committee, nominating committee, and three standing committees (claims, medical care, and legal committees), which typically meet on a quarterly basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.64; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 55.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $640K · 42 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.