Calhoun County Senior Citizens Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591945679
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Blountstown, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8506744163
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,111,047
- Expenses
- $2,616,521
- Assets
- $1,972,505
- Liabilities
- $192,522
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLENN KIMBREL (PRESIDENT)
- DANNY RYALS (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARILYN RUSSELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARILYN RUSSELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $94,808 total reported compensation
- DEANNE COX (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $43,929 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the calhoun county senior citizens association, inc. Is to encourage and provide community services primarily for those people sixty years of age and over, without regard to race, creed, or national origin, who can use then and that will contribute to their well-being and continued social and physical functioning.
What it reported doing in 2025
Calhoun transit: calhoun county transit is the community transportation coordinator (ctc) for calhoun county fl. Transportation services are provided to the general public by way of a reservation system. Currently, transportation is offered under two programs to include the medicaid recipient program and the transportation disadvantage program. Through the transportation programs, participants are able to attend appointments that are located across northwest Florida and southern Alabama at a low costs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.9%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.9%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.9% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $95K · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $357K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.