Calexico Chamber of Commerce

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
950592500
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Calexico, CA, USA
Phone
7603571166
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$161,579
Expenses
$163,671
Assets
$14,056
Liabilities
$46,825

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIK ORTEGA (Vice President)
  • CARLTON HARGRAVE (President)

People named in this filing

  • HILDY CARRILLO (Executive Direc)
  • ROBERT HERRERA (Director)
  • JOE MORENO (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the improvement and development of the community's economic base to insure the well being of all it's residents.

What it reported doing in 2015

Meetings and conferencesthe chamber regularly participates in at least six meetings and conferences per month.the border issues committee, and ad hoc committee dealing with local issues that affect businesses in calexicoregular meetings with the port of entry director discussing port policies that affect calexico.meetings with congressman bob filner and California assembly person manuel perez (and/or their staff people) to discuss issues affecting calexico.meeting with the mayor of mexicali, baja California, mexcio regarding issues affecting both cities.meetings with officials from san diego state - calexico campus - regarding educational issues.meetings with the border chambers coalition (chambers from brownsville, Texas to san diego, California) to share issues and discuss problems.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.3%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.33; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -41.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.