Caleb Would Go
Legal name: Caleb Would Go Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 871977655
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Nokomis, FL, USA
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,721
- Expenses
- $52,183
- Assets
- $32,736
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chris Lorenz (Executive Director)
- Parker Thurman (President)
- Troy Mangum (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Chris Lorenz (Executive Director)
- Parker Thurman (President)
- Troy Mangum (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We exist to empower individuals & families to fulfill the Great Commission (Matt. 28:18-20). We are a Christian organization founded to honor the legacy of Caleb Bell by funding missionaries who demonstrate bold and adventurous characteristics similar to his.
What it reported doing in 2024
We exist to support and invest in missionaries around the world that see a serious need in their community and have a new idea on how to meet that need. We offer our grants as a means to get their idea off the ground and give life to their dreams. We want to empower those that see needs that others dont and invest and mobilize their ideas for bringing abundant life. In 2024 we have granted to 16 different missionaries around the world whose ideas we have funded include: a trade school to teach life skills to underprivileged children training facilities for missionaries and a computer room for a remote and isolated community
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 31
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.6%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 37.4%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.2%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 41.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -96.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.1% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 75.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 27.6% of revenue deployed · 37.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.