Cal State University Long Beach Alum Asn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237110314
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Long Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5629855252
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Alumni Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $453,906
- Expenses
- $537,817
- Assets
- $1,641,531
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the CSULB Alumni Association is to assist and advance the university in its pursuit of excellence and ensure a strong, dynamic alumni program that will stimulate interest, build loyalty, increase involvement, and generate support.
What it reported doing in 2012
Assist and advance the Alumni in their pursuit of excellence, continue the friendships formed in the University, build strong and mutually beneficial ties between the University and its diverse alumni, promote goodwill in the community and create a dynamic alumni program which will stimulate interest, build loyalty, increase involvement and generate support for the University.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 69.9%; rating input score 70; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.05; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $447K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 13 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.