Cadbury Senior Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311717073
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Wall Township, NJ, USA
Phone
7324303650
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$-44,361
Expenses
$933,477
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VICTOR D AMEY (PRESIDENT AND CEO TO 9/30/17)

People named in this filing

  • WILLIAM C PROBSTING (DIRECTOR)
  • RICHARD GRIER-REYNOLDS (DIRECTOR)
  • GERALD T HAVERS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide quality health care options and meet the changing needs of todays' senior citizens.

What it reported doing in 2018

Provided managerial, administrative and fiscal oversight to the cherry hill and lewes continuing care retirement communities as well as the cadbury senior services affiliates. The affiliates of cadbury senior services consisted of a total of 268 independent living units, 109 licensed assisted living beds, and healthcare centers consisting of 145 licensed nursing beds. The philosophy of the cadbury senior services affiliates was to equip itself to meet the physical, emotional, recreational, social and spiritual needs of its residents. As of october 4, 2018 the organization dissolved and transferred any remaining assets to its related organization cadbury at cherry hill, inc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2,204.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.