Cabo Church
Legal name: Cabo English Church Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203743267
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Cabo San Lucas, CA, Mexico
- Phone
- (624) 247 3847; (949) 22 7088
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $578,715
- Expenses
- $582,381
- Assets
- $832,899
- Liabilities
- $1,040
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Michael Powell (Vice President)
- Michael Galles (President)
People named in this filing
- Wilfredo Bosque (Director)
- Randall Emerson (Director)
- Michael Powell (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Striving to fulfill the Great Commission. We believe that every person, Christian and non-Christian alike, is valuable to God and His Kingdom. Because people are eternally valuable to God, they are to us as well. We therefore believe that our primary responsibility is to share the saving knowledge of the Gospel of Jesus Christ with all people and lead them into an intimate and personal relationship with Jesus Christ.
What it reported doing in 2025
Feeding los Cabos kids: Cabo english church, los Cabos, Mexico: provided basic needs of food and clothing to the local residents in the poorest communities. Financial support to local Mexican pastors. Presently, Cabo Church has 11 kitchens that are feeding the children three times a week. Through the donations, it is able to provide an average of 5,000 meals a month. This number continually increases. In order to fulfill the mission of Family Care Cambodia, many programs and activities have been conducted, like Rescue Shelter Assistance, Student Hostel Assistance, Rural Education Programs, Mentorship Programs, Training Seminars and Workshops Translation and dissemination of educational materials via literature, website, audio/visual Christian Counseling and Bible courses Humanitarian Aid: Channel donated goods and supplies to poor and disadvantaged people Development Programs: Tangible infrastructure development through construction and renovation projects for the
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $582K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.