C-learning
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273327674
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Plano, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9724037676
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $320,500
- Expenses
- $387,894
- Assets
- $65,538
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN B MUNS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN B MUNS (PRESIDENT): $54,750 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
C-learning was formed to coordinate, provide, and assist in funding continuous learning opportunities for outstanding educational leaders at all levels (including, without limitation, superintendents, principals, teachers, and college professors) through a variety of experiences designed to spark their creativity, imagination, and enthusiasm.
What it reported doing in 2014
The principals' institute - the principals' institute is the first of many learning opportunities that will be created by c-learning. The purpose of the principals' institute is to develop concrete standards against which campuses can measure their effectiveness in achieving educational aspirations for 21st century students in Texas. Building upon the ideas expressed by superintendents who participated in the Texas visioning institute/ the principals' institute brings together the most innovative campus leaders from all of the school districts in Texas (at this time, 42 districts) to study creating a new vision, meet and train with educational experts, develop campus-specific practices that align with the ideas expressed in creating a new vision, and work through the details of what it means to be a 21st century campus. One of the goals of the principals' institute is to design the campus and classroom of the future.the work of the principals' institute is designed around six two-day meetings over a one-year period beginning in june. Readings, virtual collaboration, and sharing are also a major part of the work, and collaboration and communication will continue between meetings. C-learning will bring in instructors and educators as part of this program.c-learning is currently exploring a relationship with university of north Texas-denton to provide principals' institute participants with educational credit in exchange for participation.principals' institute participants (or their employers) will pay some portion of the cost of participation. However, c-learning's goal is to permit participation at the lowest possible cost.a new cadre of participants will participate in the principals' institute each year, and alumni will remain involved in principals' institute activities, including networking, research, and education. Interested individuals (or their relevant school districts) will apply for entry into the principals' institute. Individuals from all Texas school districts will be eligible to apply. Participants will be selected by a group of principals and superintendents appointed by the board of directors of c-learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 71
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 69.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 50.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $354K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 18 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $160K reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.