Byhalia Area Chamber of Commerce
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 640855085
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Byhalia, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6628388127
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $123,623
- Expenses
- $134,058
- Assets
- $188,700
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Delores Lay (President)
- Sharon Taylor (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Dontrell Stroman (Treasurer)
- Janice Wagg (Secretary)
- Sue Brents (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote local businesses and commerce in the Byhalia and Greater Marshall County Communities
What it reported doing in 2025
The chamber serves to strengthen business, foster partnerships and advance economic growth and success through various channels. Promoting members with our social media, digital newsletters and website directory while retaining regional footprint for serving business and industry. Added recurring educational Power Hour seminars along with a recurring Women in Business brunch to our existing monthly networking breakfast and quarterly luncheons to better serve our members providing information and tools to help them be more sucessful and plan for the future of their business. We continue to host our annual golf tournament that provides great networking and sponsorship opportunities. Collaborate with local organizations for the betterment of the entire region and area we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.4%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 42.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.