Buyer Rehabilitation Project Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871186192
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Lutz, FL, USA
Phone
8135531138
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$89,985
Expenses
$84,230
Assets
$1,678
Liabilities
$1,857

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALLAN TEIXEIRA (CEO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID HUDSON (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ALLAN TEIXEIRA (CEO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID HUDSON (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • MIKE WASP (TREASURER, DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to reduce human trafficking in our community through activities including, but not limited to, working with other organizations to provide recovery group programs and classes for addicted sex buyers.

What it reported doing in 2025

Launched a second prison recovery group at polk correctional institution. This initiative reflects the continued dedication to providing hope, healing, and transformation for incarcerated individuals. Through structured recovery programs, we aim to address deep-seated challenges, foster personal growth, and empower participants to build healthier lives. Expanding our reach within polk correctional institution allows us to extend this vital support to even more individuals on their path toward redemption and renewal.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.11; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 57.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 48.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.