Butterfly Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882078077
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
4808613024
Rating
94
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$187,549
Expenses
$179,771
Assets
$34,534
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DIANE MATSUMOTO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVEN GIEBEL (DIRECTOR)
  • MELISSA POURE (DIRECTOR)
  • DIANE MATSUMOTO (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The butterfly collaborative is an organization working to leverage nontraditional alliances between medical/dental providers, churches, NGO's, business leaders, and universities to accomplish large international integrative healthcare and nutrition projects to improve service delivery, outcomes, and impact.

What it reported doing in 2025

Research and development - provided mentoring and shared medical expertise in collaboration with the butterfly collaborative malawi and malawi's only medical school, kamuzu university of health sciences, to conduct research in nutrition, anemia, cervical cancer and infectious diseases.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 27% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 59.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $173K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.