Blocs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232125843
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
King of Prussia, PA, United States
Phone
484-704-2300
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$213,597,549
Expenses
$100,723,260
Assets
$255,517,927
Liabilities
$9,283,006

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

51 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT J DELANY SR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • DAVID ROWAN (FORMER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID ROWAN (FORMER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $466,344 total reported compensation
  • THEODORE AICHER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (THRU 1/25)): $291,510 total reported compensation
  • JEFFREY GIBSON (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $219,753 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

& Vision For over forty years, BLOCS has been committed to providing eligible families access to high-quality, tuition-based education, providing students with a positive and successful pathway forward. Viewed as the premiere scholarship organization in PA, BLOCS partners with more than 500 schools to provide over 33,000 need-based scholarships each year in 65 of the 67 counties. Through partnership with Pennsylvania’s DCED’s Educational Improvement (EITC) and Opportunity Scholarship Tax Credit (OSTC) Programs, BLOCS offers donors up to 90-99% credits on their Pennsylvania taxes when redirecting their personal or corporate tax liability as need-based scholarships through BLOCS.

What it reported doing in 2024

Pennsylvania businesses and individual taxpayers have participated in the eitc, ostc and pre-k tax credit programs offered by the state department of community and economic development (dced). The significant contributions and participation provided by these businesses and individuals allowed blocs to award over 19,000 catholic and private school scholarships to numerous counties in Pennsylvania for families in financial need.see schedule o.for this year, blocs has worked with close to 200 businesses and over 2,000 individual taxpayers to take advantage of over $200 million in tax credits. However, the need for additional financial assistance remains significant as blocs received over 30,000 applications and over $100 million dollars in qualified need. Blocs through the scholarship committee has established an emergency scholarship program which reviews emergency requests for financial assistance for families based on extenuating circumstances that greatly affect a family's income and ability to pay for education. For the current year, blocs provided support of approximately $595,000. Blocs has also developed the urban endowment initiative to sustain targeted schools in poor and low performing school district areas. Under this initiative, nine schools work with blocs to adopt successful practices in marketing and management. The schools maintain an open enrollment policy and blocs assists the schools to help meet operational needs through endowment distributions. For the current year this support totaled approximately $1 million.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47.7%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: $876.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 52.8%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.54; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 47.7% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 39 of 39 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $98.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $466K · 51 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $467K reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 370 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 362 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.