Business Leaders for Michigan
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381941576
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3132595400
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,495,456
- Expenses
- $4,764,332
- Assets
- $7,671,835
- Liabilities
- $1,374,814
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
114 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEFFREY DONOFRIO (PRESIDENT)
- RANDI BERRIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TIMOTHY SOWTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LINDSAY CASE-PALSROK (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JEFFREY DONOFRIO (PRESIDENT): $721,763 total reported compensation
- JACQUELINE WIGGINS (COO/TREASURER/SECRETARY): $351,729 total reported compensation
- RANDI BERRIS (VICE PRESIDENT): $333,919 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Business leaders for Michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making Michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy. Guided by research and diverse perspectives, we develop strategies, shape public policy and drive initiatives that bring people and ideas together to ignite change - for growth, shared prosperity and lasting progress.
What it reported doing in 2024
- bolster business climate: preserve flexibility in the workplace for employers and employees. Spearhead advocacy efforts and/or support coalitions opposing harmful proposals. Build coalitions; identify and promote alternatives to extreme proposals. Champion long-term solutions that uplift michiganders.- holistic economic development: strengthen and streamline the state's toolbox around business attraction/retention, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Link to holistic needs (i.e., tax credits, site development, access to talent, etc.).- k-12 education reform: launch Michigan debuted the blm-designed district comparison dashboard to help build awareness of our public-school system's underperformance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.7%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 99%; rating input score 99; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 55.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.7% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 98 of 99 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $722K · 114 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.