Burn Advocates Network Ltd C/o Samuel L Davis Esq
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260653597
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Teaneck, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 8442876411
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,619
- Expenses
- $69,202
- Assets
- $113,367
- Liabilities
- $3,192
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SAMUEL L DAVIS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KERI ANN MALO (TRUSTEE)
- E HANI MANSOUR MD (TRUSTEE)
- SAMUEL L DAVIS (BOARD PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We organized burn camps in israel, india, brazil, and haiti. We began construction of i-pearls laser center of excellence at sheba medical center, the first pediatric laser facility in the middle east dedicated to improving the scars in children without invasive surgery. We sponsor the pediatric section of the israel burn congress which educates an international cohort of burn clinicians on emerging technology and best practices.
What it reported doing in 2024
Camp samba- on july 21, 2017, burn advocates network, in partnership with the brazilian burn society, opened camp samba in a beautified camping site outside of sao paulo near the city of campos do jordao. Campers between the ages of 5 and 17 are able to meet with other burn survivors with the same issue; burn scars.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 31
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 37.5%; rating input score 37
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.3%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.64; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28% of revenue deployed · 37.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.