Burlington Baroque Festival Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934536432
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Burlington, VT, USA
Phone
8025989677
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,116
Expenses
$78,530
Assets
$57,642

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CATHY STADECKER (BOARD PRESID)
  • MARY ELLEN JOLLEY (BOARD VICE P)
  • HANNAH MILNES (BOARD SECRET)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The exempt purposes of burlington baroque are charitable and educational. The goals are to celebrate and foster appreciation for music of the 17th- 19th centuries by presenting audiences with historically-informed performances on the period instruments for which the music was written, and the support of related activities consistent with these goals. The primary activity of burlington baroque directly furthers these goals by presenting concerts meeting these criteria, a spring concert for the lenten season, a four day baroque festival in early fall in burlington, vt, and a series of messiah concerts in december presented in burlington, vt and surrounding cities. Secondary activities, such as educational materials and pre-concert lectures, will also further these goals.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization presented eight (8) baroque concerts in 2025 with approximately seventeen hundred (1700) people attending the concerts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.9%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 76.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 173.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $79K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.