Burlingame Lions Charities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943292425
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-T 2023, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Burlingame, CA, USA
Phone
6503445456
Rating
32
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,923
Expenses
$38,745
Assets
$426,262
Liabilities
$8,355

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACK VAN ETTEN (Vice President)
  • REGINALD SMITH (President)

People named in this filing

  • BERNICE MACCHIA (Chairman)
  • JOSEPH SUAREZ (Director)
  • ANTHONY TANSIMORE (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose for which the organization was formed are as follows:(1) to benefit the community by encouraging gits to the organization for allocation to: section 501(c)(3) organization for scientific, education or charitable purposes; or; the city of burlingame or any department thereof, for exclusively public purposes.(2) to stimulate an awareness of the needs of the community and to inform of the needs and how they can be met with charitable contributions.(3) to assist in harmonizing and making more efficient the work of charitable organization in burlingame, and in other communities in the county of san mateo, California, by cooperating with and assisting such organizations, and by receiving by gift, will, or otherwise, money or other proper means and distributing it as may be deemed best for the promotion of charity in such communities; and to do any and all other things necessary or proper in connection with or incidental to any of the foregoing.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other grants and achievements

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - Program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 5.5%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 5.5% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series balance sheet did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.