Burley High School Band Booster Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852903941
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Burley, ID, USA
Rating
92
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,381
Expenses
$12,092
Assets
$66,784
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Erika Krivanic (President)
  • Janene Adams (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Erika Krivanic (President)
  • Janene Adams (Vice President)
  • Julie Richman (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the Band Booster Association is to support and elevate the band program. We encourage student and community engagement. Help raise money to pay for trips, supplies, and equipment. Host a competition with other bands in neighboring cities and towns. We help recruit volunteers to help staff performing art events and athletic concession stands. We foster a spirit and support the Burley High School, providing opportunities for students to raise funds to participate in band and all the accompanying activities.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Band Booster Association has made significant contributions to the Burley High School band program by raising over $90,000 through various fundraising efforts, which were used to support student trips, purchase instruments, and provide essential equipment. We organized an annual regional band competition that involved over 500 students, parents, and community members, offering valuable performance opportunities and fostering school spirit. In addition, we coordinated over 200 volunteer hours for arts events, engaged more than 200 parents and community members in monthly meetings and social events, and provided scholarships and financial assistance to students to ensure equitable participation. Through these efforts, we have not only supported student musicians but also strengthened community involvement and school pride in the band program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 75%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.52; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 37.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.