Burbank Arts and Education Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205128863
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Burbank, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8187295593
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $267,356
- Expenses
- $210,777
- Assets
- $897,627
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
People named in this filing
- JENNIFER LORIGO (CHAIR)
- LLOYD UMALI RESIGNED 8225 (TREASURER)
- JOHNATHON PIMENTEL (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To engage and inspire the community to invest in meeting the diverse educational needs of every busd student.
What it reported doing in 2025
The burbank arts & education foundation (baef) advances excellence and equity in burbank public schools by investing in creative, academic, and innovative learning opportunities for all students. With the support of donors and community partners, baef works to ensure that every student in the burbank unified school district (busd) has access to an engaging, inclusive, and inspiring public school experience.in 2025, baef awarded $65,153 in grants to schools throughout busd, funding a wide range of impactful programs. We received fewer than usual grant applications from schools in the spring and fall grant cycles, so we were unable to gift our allocated budget of $100,000. For this reason the board voted to increase our grants giving budget in 2026 to provide additional grantmaking opportunities.in 2025, baef's board approved a grantmaking budget of $100,000 for the foundation's spring and fall grant cycles. Due to fewer qualifying applications received from busd schools during these cycles, the foundation awarded $65,153 in grants during the year. The foundation's grantmaking process is application-driven, and awards reflect the volume and eligibility of requests received in a given cycle. Visual and performing arts: grants provided instruments, art supplies, theater workshops, production support, and upgraded equipment enabling students from elementary through high school to participate fully in high-quality arts education and performance and production experiences.stem enrichment: funding supported computer upgrades, math curriculum, outdoor classrooms, and hands-on science activities, equipping students with real-world problem-solving skills and access to cutting-edge technology.wellness, safety, and inclusion initiatives: the foundation prioritized mental health, physical wellness, and social-emotional learning by supporting school-based programs that create safe, inclusive environments where all students can thrive. The foundation funded a high school student driven project providing signs for easier and more accessible campus navigation.classroom innovation: teachers were empowered to enhance learning through play-based learning centers, project-based learning kits, creative instructional tools, and culturally responsive novels and curriculum-fostering deeper student engagement and academic growth.in 2025, we introduced a college preparation program, offering a low-cost college essay workshop to rising 12th graders.in september 2025, baef hosted its annual state of the schools event at woodbury university, bringing together educators, community leaders, and stakeholders to celebrate the accomplishments of the students and educators we support, and share our initiatives, and progress. The foundation's mission is closely aligned with these priorities, ensuring that community support is directed toward innovative and inclusive projects that strengthen the future of education in burbank.to further its outreach, baef also organized and participated in numerous community engagement events throughout the year. These events helped build awareness, foster meaningful connections, and celebrate the vital role of public education. Each gathering served as an opportunity to showcase student success stories and inspire continued investment in burbank's schools. Highlights were booths at burbank's holiday in the park and burbank non profit coalition's back to school backpack drive.in addition to its grantmaking and engagement efforts, baef maintained a strategic investment fund through its partnership with the community foundation of the verdugos, supporting long-term financial growth and sustainability.the foundation's impact is made possible by the generosity of individual donors, corporate sponsors, and dedicated volunteers. Baef continues to serve as a vital bridge between the community and public schools-working to ensure that every student, in every classroom, has access to opportunity, creativity, and success.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.5%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 64.3%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 57%; rating input score 57; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.2%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.26; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.5% of revenue deployed · 64.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $135K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 22 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.