Built Noco
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 991211279
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Loveland, CO, USA
- Phone
- 9702904571
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,583
- Expenses
- $131,352
- Assets
- $62,869
- Liabilities
- $17,038
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- MEGAN GALLAGHER (DIRECTOR)
- MIKE HENSLEY (TREASUER)
- IAN SIMKISS (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Built noco bridges the gap between students and the construction industry, guiding them toward established career pathways with the training and volunteer support they need. By fostering community engagement, mentorship, and hands-on training, the organization aims to equip students with the skills, knowledge, and support needed to become successful professionals and active contributors to the workforce. The goal is to elevate awareness of the diverse and meaningful opportunities within the skilled trades, driving economic growth and development in northern Colorado.
What it reported doing in 2025
Built noco's sole programming is focused on the provision of a curriculum for education in construction and the trades for high schoolers, with the coverage of all consequential certifications. As well as, proper networking evens and trainings to support the hiring of students in apprenticeships, interships, part-time and full-time roles. These rolse are tracked to understand progress toward the goal of workforce development. The program has anumber of work-based learning opportunities and certificate tracking. Built noco provides programs in 17 locations, serving over 1,000 students in northern Colorado.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.3%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 45.8%; rating input score 46
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.7%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.3% of revenue deployed · 45.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.