Building the Wyoming We Want

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263451852
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Cheyenne, WY, USA
Phone
307-777-2800
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$165
Assets
$1,603
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD C MCGINITY (CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To spur local level discussions about the development of a broadly & publicly supported strategy for growth. _**Our Mission:** Our job is to lead economic growth. We make the change needed to overcome barriers at the state level and support local communities in charting their own paths._ We Need Your Seat at the Table We are sharing these as drafts because a boardroom perspective is only one part of the conversation. Real economic resilience is built by the people doing the work on the ground—our **#TeamOfThousands**. _**Our Vision:** A Wyoming where businesses can succeed, communities can compete, and people have the jobs and opportunities they need to build and maintain a life here._ _**Our Mission:** Our job is to lead economic growth. We make the change needed to overcome barriers at the state level and support local communities in charting their own paths._ We Need Your Seat at...

What it reported doing in 2014

Research to find common values utilizing workshops combined with technology and extensive public awareness campaigns to assist with desired growth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.72; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -88.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -79.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -78.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $165 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.