Building the Next Generation of Academic Physicians
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473330126
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Rye Brooke, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9172970043
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $393,041
- Expenses
- $239,517
- Assets
- $872,475
- Liabilities
- $2,147
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN P SANCHEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- NELSON SANCHEZ (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN P SANCHEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $39,615 total reported compensation
- NICHOLAS BRUTUS (CO TREASURER): $9,458 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The building the next generation of academic physicians (bngap) mission is to help diverse medical students and residents become aware of academic medicine as a career option and to provide them with the resources to further explore and potentially embark on an academic medicine career.
What it reported doing in 2025
Prefac center - the lgbt health workforce conference is the largest and most well known national lgbt health workforce conference in the united states held annually in New York city. The conference provides an overview of up-to-date practices (climate, educational, research, and clinical) in preparing the health care workforce to address the health concerns and disparities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (lgbt) communities. This conference is designed for health professionals (m.d., d.o., p.a.-c., r.n., n.p., pharm.d., d.d., ph.d., ed.d., public health practitioners, social workers, psychologists, etc.), researchers, educators, administrators, and students (pre-health professions, professional schools, and graduate), but all interested are invited to attend. During the 2024 conference, we received over one hundred-fifty registrants for this three day conference which includes several awards and research presentations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.8%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.1%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.64; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.5%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 48.8% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $192K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $40K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.