Building Officials Association of Georgia
Legal name: Building Officials Association of Georgia Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814524052
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Snellville, GA, US
- Phone
- 7067280183
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $95,664
- Expenses
- $101,671
- Assets
- $98,140
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOEY DAVENPORT (PRESIDENT & IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- JAMES BROOKER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT & PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN CARPENTER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT & 1ST VP)
- JAMES MARTIN (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOEY DAVENPORT (PRESIDENT & IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- JAMES BROOKER (1ST VICE PRESIDENT & PRESIDENT)
- SUSAN CARPENTER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT & 1ST VP)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Code Officials are committed to serving the public interest in building safety, health and welfare by advancing high and consistent building standards through the professional competence of its members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Membership with boag offers some great incentives, such as training, affordable preferred provider ceu opportunities and more. Boag now offers more educational opportunities than ever. We have mini-conferences located throughout the state, on a quarterly basis. Boag is proud to provide its members with state recognized inspector certification program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.5%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 96.5% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $92K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.