Builders Club of Lincoln Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300995277
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Lincoln, MA, USA
Phone
7812599228
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Domestic Fraternal Societies

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,000
Expenses
$43,483
Assets
$310,920
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC ZIZZA (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID O HILF (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN TOTO (DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL BLOOM (DIRECTOR)
  • JIM ENILA (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To maintain a building in lincoln ma for the use and benefit of the masonic fraternity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Maintenance of a building in lincoln ma for the use and benefit of the masonic fraternity. Joseph warren-soley masonic lodge (the lodge) uses the building for its regular monthly meetings (10), rehearsal meetings, special functions, and officers' meetings. Since the corporation is a 501(c)-10 organization it furthers its exempt purpose by allowing the lodge to carry out its fraternal and charitable purposes by providing space to do so. The boy scouts use the building to hold meetings. The boy scouts is a 501(c)-3 organization and by letting them use the building, the corporation furthers its exempt purpose. Other masonic affiliated organizations, such as the order of the eastern star, use the building. Since these organizations are exempt organizations, the corporation furthers its fraternal and charitable purposes by letting them use the building. These organizations use the building on a regular basis.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.15; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -22.3% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.