Build Futures

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900629740
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Huntington Beach, CA, USA
Phone
7149077358
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Housing Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,856
Expenses
$313,036
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Robert Bartosch (President)

People named in this filing

  • Michael Monahan (Treasurer)
  • Robert Bartosch (President)
  • Patricia Whitman (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Build Futures purpose is to help Transitional Age Youth TAY age 18-24 from homelessness to self sufficiency by providing housing and a step-by-step program of intervention called Steps to Success.

What it reported doing in 2023

Build Futures was able to continue our mission as we housed 87 Transitional age youth, age 18-24, in 2022. We shifted the way we implement our Steps to Success by meeting out clients out in the field at government agency offices like DMV or Social Services or EDD or other non-profits instead of bringing them into the office as we did before the pandemic. For many of our clients meeting them at the places they need to go for ID or EBT or jobs or medical care resources helped them feel more comfortable and facilitated them getting the things they need to be successful independent adults. We had no staffing changes in 2022.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -226.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -15.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.