Buena Vista Heritage

What it reported doing in 2024

Fifty years ago, a late-night conversation changed the course of buena vista's history. Suzy kelly's husband, bryce, returned home from a school board meeting with shocking news: they were going to demolish the historic our courtroom isn't just for justice; it's also a stage for dreams. Motion exchange dance calls our space home, providing a beautiful setting for local dancers to learn and grow. This beloved building, nearly a century old, had served as the county courthouse and later as the town school, educating generations of buena vista's residents. As a cornerstone of main street since the town's inception, it held a special place in the community's heart. Unfortunately, with changing needs, the structure fell into disrepair. The behemoth of a building required substantial time and investment to restore its former grandeur, and neither the town nor school board had the resources to undertake this task consequently, it was decided that the old courthouse would be demolished, and its history would be relegated to photos and stories. Fortunately, a group of concerned citizens saw the beauty behind the crumbling brick and peeling paint. They recognized the irreplaceable resource in the our properties serve as living classrooms, wherehistory is not just taught, but experienced. Historic walls and towering cupola, and they chose not to let that history be lost to abunch of bulldozers. From a humble beginning in 1974, buena vista heritage has evolved into a thriving community cornerstone. Over the years, we've expanded our reach, and have attracted thousands of visitors annually from around the globe. Buena vista heritage continues to flourish, and we eagerly anticipate the possibilities that lie ahead.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
• Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
• Fundraising efficiency: $6.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Missing
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.57; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings