Buen Provecho Collective Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 994369175
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Key Biscayne, FL, USA
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,334
- Expenses
- $22,214
- Assets
- $6,148
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Kathryn Doolittle (Director)
- Nancy Guzman (Director)
- Miranda De Gasperi (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Buen Provecho Collective BPC operates as a 501c3 nonprofit focusing on educational and charitable goals. Our mission is to democratize art access support local creatives and build a resilient community. BPC offers workshops events and creative experiences to make art inclusive and approachable. We aim to remove barriers to artistic expression providing resources and opportunities for emerging artists. By fostering safe and joyful experiences we combat social isolation promoting mental well being and community cohesion. We are an entirely volunteer-run organization.
What it reported doing in 2025
BPC was commissioned by the City of Miami Beach to create and deliver an all-ages family-friendly art program with multiple activities and art stations for their Paws in the Park public activation on May 10th. We planned the art activities each stationed with a professional art educator to guide families purchased materials and facilitated the workshop for around 100 participants and their pets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 79% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 26.3%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 31.2%; rating input score 31
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.6%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 141.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 135.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 100.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 26.3% of revenue deployed · 31.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.